Contact information

Research interests

Political theory, indigenous rights, political history, policy analysis.

Recent publications

2016. Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media [Elections to the Sámi Parliament: voters, parties and media]. Stockholm: Santérus förlag (co-edited with Ragnhild Nilsson & Stefan Dahlberg). Including:

2016. ”Inledning [Introduction]”, i Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 27-43 (co-written with Ragnhild Nilsson & Stefan Dahlberg).

2016. “Historisk bakgrund: den svenska statens politik och samisk politisk mobilisering [Historical background: the Swedish State’s policy and Sámi political mobilisation]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 45-75 (co-written with Patrik Lantto).

2016. “Valsystem, partier och kandidater [Electoral system, parties and candidates]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 77-101 (co-written with Anna-Maria Fjellström, Marie Knobloch & Ragnhild Nilsson).

2016. “Valdeltagande i sametingsvalet 2013 [Election turn-out in the election to the Sámi Parliament in 2013]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag,129-154 (co-written with Stefan Dahlberg).

2016.“Partiernas väljare och partival [the parties’ voters and the voters’ parties]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 155-179 (co-written with Stefan Dahlberg).

2016.“Politiska skiljelinjer vid Sametingsval [Political cleavages in elstions to the Sámi Parliament]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 181-200 (co-written with Ragnhild Nilsson & Richard Svensson).

2016.”Valdeltagande, skiljelinjer och legitimitet: en jämförelse med Norge [Electoral turn-out, cleavages, and legitimacy: a comparison with Norway]”, in Ragnhild Nilsson, Stefan Dahlberg och Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Sametingsval: väljare, partier och media. Stockholm: Santérus förlag, 289-311 (co-written with Johannes Bergh, Stefan Dahlberg & Jo Saglie).

2016. Politisk teori [Political Theory]. 2nd rev. ed. Malmö: Liber förlag (co-edited with Ludvig Beckman).

2016. ”The Nordic Sámediggis and the Limits of Indigenous Self-Determination”, Gáldu Cála – Journal of Indigenous Peoples Rights No. 1, 6-46 (co-written with Eva Josefsen & Ragnhild Nilsson).

2016.  “Urfolks rätt till självbestämmande [Indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination]”, in Ludvig Beckman & Ulf Mörkenstam (ed.) Politisk teori. 2nd rev. ed. Malmö: Liber förlag.

2016. “Indigenous Self-Determination through a Government Agency? The impossible task of the Swedish Sámediggi”, International Journal of Minority and Group Rights 1, 2016 (co-written with Rebecca Lawrence)

2015. “Recognition As if Sovereigns: A Procedural Understanding of Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination”, Citizenship Studies, 19(6-7): 634-648.

2015. “Patterned Inequalities and the Inequality Regime of a Swedish Housing Company”, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5(4), 105-124 (co-written with Kristina Boréus).

2015. “Action, Organization and Confrontation: Strategies of the Sámi movement in Sweden during the 20th century”, in Mikkel Berg-Nordlie, Jo Saglie & Ann Sullivan (eds.), Indigenous Politics: Institutions, Representation, Mobilisation. Colchester: ECPR Press, 131-159 (co-written with Patrik Lantto).

2015. “Different Institutions in Similar States: The Norwegian and Swedish Sámediggis”, Ethnopolitics, 14(1): 32-51 (co-written with Eva Josefsen and Jo Saglie).

Work in progress

“Organised hypocrisy? The Indigenous Rights Regime in Sweden”

“Size and Indigenous Self-Determination”

“Presumed Equality as Precondition for Mutual Recognition” (co-written with Andreas Gottardis)


Current research projects

Who are “We, the People”? Popular sovereignty in national constitutions and the challenge of indigenous peoples

(principal investigator, with Ludvig Beckman, Kirsty Gover and Sofia Näsström, funded by the Swedish Research Council 2016-2018)

A central idea in modern democracies is that the coercive powers of the state are legitimate only if they derive from the people. The significance of this idea can be found in the numerous constitutional documents where popular sovereignty is highlighted as key principle, or where “we the people” is declared the ultimate source of the constitutional order. But in recent decades, “the people” itself has become a controversial. A variety of groups compete today for the title of the sovereign people. The people as the ultimate source of public power is challenged both by eroding faith in nationalism as a unifying force in plural societies and by different groups’ mobilization for self-determination. Indigenous peoples are a case in point, a critical case, as the right to self-determination challenges the unified understanding of “the people” in popular sovereignty.

This project studies the problem of the people in popular sovereignty empirically as well as theoretically by distinguishing between constitutional self-definitions of the people and popular self-definitions of the people. The former refers to the legally defined people, its attributes and powers, whereas the latter refers to acts by individuals and groups to constitute themselves as collective entities. Varieties of these distinct and often conflicting conceptions of the people are studied by the collection of three unique sets of data including: (i) descriptions and categories of the people in national constitutions; (ii) the recognition and rights of indigenous peoples in national constitutions; and (iii) rules of membership in tribal and indigenous constitutions.

The project contributes to constitutional and democratic theory by addressing three distinct challenges to the ideal of popular sovereignty. First, the problem of self-definition holds that peoples are never able to define themselves but are always the creations of exercises of public power. What is the status of the people as the source of normative legitimacy given the problem of self-definition? Second, the problem of sovereignty concerns the conflicting aspirations of national and indigenous peoples towards popular sovereignty. Is the ideal of popular sovereignty viable given the challenges of indigenous people to existing constitutional definitions of the people? Third, the problem of liberal equality concerns the tensions between the values of nondiscrimination and equal treatment, on the one hand, and indigenous/tribal attempts towards self-definition, on the other hand. Are rules of membership based on kinship, decent or genealogy consistent with the defining values of liberal democracy?

The project generates new knowledge by systematically exploring – on the basis of a unique data collection – the problem with the people in national and indigenous peoples’ constitutions. The focus on the problem of popular sovereignty contributes to previously ignored issues in democratic and constitutional theory. The project also generates important results from a social point of view when it gives us new knowledge about the formal status and rights for indigenous peoples in the world, and how their continuing struggle for recognition is established by constitutional politics.

The Sámi Parliaments as Representative Bodies: A Comparative Study of the Elections in Sweden and Norway 2013

(principal investigator, with colleagues from Norway and Sweden, funded by Formas 2012-2016)

The last two decades we have witnessed a growing global acknowledgement of indigenous rights, for instance manifested in the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Nordic countries have all responded to Sámi right claims by establishing popularly elected Sámi parliaments to serve as representative bodies of the Sámi people. Research on the parliaments’ position and function within the Sámi communities is, however, rare. The aim of this project is to analyse and compare the Sámi parliaments’ position and function within the Sámi communities in Sweden and Norway.

The comparative approach will generate new knowledge on both the Sámi parliaments’ position in respective country and on the impact of different institutional arrangements on the political mediation and representation of Sámi interests. A contemporary perspective is, however, not enough in order to understand the differences between the parliaments - a historical analysis of the Sámi movements’ political mobilisation and the political strategies chosen are decisive for our understanding of contemporary politics and the Sámi parliaments’ position today. The project thus consists of three parts: (i) to gather and make available information/statistics connected to earlier elections to the Sámi parliaments; (ii) to carry out an election study of the elections to the Sámi parliaments in Sweden and Norway in 2013; and (iii) to accomplish historical analyses of the political strategies of the Sámi movements in Sweden and Norway.


Previous projects (title)

Globalisation and New Political Rights. The Challenges of the Rights to Inclusion, Self-Determination and Secession (with Ludvig Beckman and Jouni Reinikainen, funded by The Swedish Research Council 2009-2016).

Indigenous rights to self-determination: The Institutional Design and Policy Process of the Swedish Sami Parliament (funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond 2009-2014)

Presumptions for Equality (with professor Kristina Boréus, funded by the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions 2004-2006).

The Inner Boundary of Democracy – the Construction of Immigrants in Swedish Politics (funded by The Swedish Research Council 2001-2003).

Conceptions of Samihood in Swedish Sami Policy 1883-1997 (doctoral project, funded by the Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm University 1995-1999).